However, on certain versions of the meta-ethical view called moral realism, moral facts are both descriptive and prescriptive at the same time. Hence, normative ethics is sometimes said to be prescriptive, rather than descriptive. To put it another way, descriptive ethics would be concerned with determining what proportion of people believe that killing is always wrong, while normative ethics is concerned with whether it is correct to hold such a belief. Normative ethics is also distinct from descriptive ethics, as the latter is an empirical investigation of people’s moral beliefs. Information that comes from descriptive ethics is, however, also used in philosophical arguments. Order custom essay Normative and Descriptive Approaches Because descriptive ethics involves empirical investigation, it is a field that is usually investigated by those working in the fields of evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology or anthropology. Research into descriptive ethics may also investigate people's ethical ideals or what actions societies condemn or punish in law or politics. Those working on descriptive ethics aim to uncover people's beliefs about such things as values, which actions are right and wrong, and which characteristics of moral agents are virtuous. Descriptive ethics is a form of empirical research into the attitudes of individuals or groups of people. info) “Descriptive ethics, also known as comparative ethics, is the study of people's beliefs about morality. There are three types of normative ethical theory-virtue, deontological, and consequentiality, each emphasizing one of these elements. For any act, there are three things that might be thought to be morally interesting: first, there is the agent, the person performing the act second, there is the act itself third, there are the consequences of the act. They were given the descriptive approach by God and they chose otherwise. Christians also believe that Adam and Eve utilized the power of what’s right and wrong. They say that God gives the individual the choice to choose what’s right and wrong. org) This approach is similar to how religious people view their God. Normative ethics is distinct from meta-ethics because it examines standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions, while meta-ethics studies the meaning of moral language and the metaphysics of moral facts. In recent years the boundaries between these sub-disciplines have increasingly been dissolving as moral theorists become more interested in applied problems and applied ethics is becoming more profoundly philosophically informed. Normative ethics is the branch of philosophical ethics that investigates the set of questions that arise when we think about the question “how ought one act, morally speaking? ” Normative ethics can be divided into the sub-disciplines of moral theory and applied ethics. You will be given a definition, a contrast, how the approaches may impact the criminal justice professional, how the approaches are similar and vary, and which approach you feel is best and why. In this paper you will be introduced to normal and descriptive ethics. It gives you the freedom to choose right from wrong. It allows moral philosophy to play its part. Ethics play a major role in decision making. We are faced with many decisions daily and have to make sure we choose the right one. Decision making can be very difficult when both choices are very appealing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |